Prince Harry has lost his legal challenge over the level of security he receives when he is in the UK.
The ruling was handed down by Judge Sir Geoffrey Vos at the Royal Courts of Justice in central London on Friday – following the two-day appeal hearing at the same court last month.
He told the court that while the Duke of Sussex‘s safety concerns were both “powerful and moving”, his “sense of grievance” did not “translate into a legal argument”.
“The conclusion, in my judgment, with which my colleagues Lord Justice Bean and Lord Justice Edith agreed, was that the Duke of Sussex’s appeal would be dismissed,” he said.
Prince Harry, 40, was challenging the original decision by High Court judge Sir Peter Lane in February 2024 that the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) was right to remove his high-level police protection when he is back in the country.
Ravec, the body responsible for the security of high-level figures, made their decision in February 2020 – after Harry and Meghan stopped working as senior royals and went to live in Canada, before settling in the US.
Harry, who was not present for the judgment being given, received full, publicly funded security protection up until that point.
Follow our channel and never miss an update
Read more
Prince Harry’s charity row explained
Watchdog opens case into charity concerns
After stepping back from royal duties, he argued that his private protection team in the US no longer had access to the UK intelligence information needed to keep his wife and children safe.
During the appeal hearing in April, which he travelled to the UK to attend in person, his barrister Shaheed Fatima KC said his safety, security, and life are “at stake”, and that the “human dimension” of the case should not be forgotten.
She said Harry believes he was “singled out” for “inferior treatment” and that Ravec did not follow its own “terms of reference” when making their ecision.
The duke had originally requested access to his previous level of security when in the country, but offered to fund the security himself.
But Sir Geoffrey said on Friday: “The duke was in effect stepping in and out of the cohort of protection provided by Ravec.
“Outside the UK, he was outside the cohort, but when in the UK, his security would be considered as appropriate.”
Therefore Ravec’s decision was “understandable and perhaps predictable”, he told the court.
The Home Office, which has legal responsibility for Ravec’s decisions, said security decisions were taken on a “case-by-case” basis.
The duke could now take the case to the Supreme Court, but would have to prove there is public interest in the case being heard there.
Legal commentator Joshua Rozenberg told Sky News after the judgment: “What the Supreme Court will look at is whether this is a case of general public interest. It seems to me it’s one of very, very specific importance to Prince Harry.”
Therefore he “wouldn’t hold out much hope”, he said.
Be the first to get Breaking News
Install the Sky News app for free
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.
