A temporary injunction that would have blocked asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Essex, has been overturned at the Court of Appeal.
The Home Office and Somani Hotels, which owns the Bell Hotel, successfully challenged a High Court ruling that would have stopped asylum seekers from being housed at the Epping lodgings.
Today’s hearing saw both parties win the right to appeal, before also winning the appeals themselves.
Lord Justice Bean, sitting with Lady Justice Nicola Davies and Lord Justice Cobb, quashed an earlier injunction granted to Epping Forest District Council, saying: “We allow the appeals and we set aside the injunction imposed on 19 August 2025.”
This means asylum seekers will stay in the accommodation in Essex past 12 September. There are currently 138 asylum seekers being housed at the hotel.
Last week, the initial court ruling centred on the change in use of the premises without consent from the local authority.
But after the Home Office argued its case – which involved stating it had the right to appeal – judges have backed the government’s side.
Lord Justice Bean laid out a litany of errors made in the initial injunction, saying the previous judge had not considered the “punitive impact” of such decisions.
Referencing the protests outside the Bell Hotel – which took place in the lead-up to the injunction being granted – he said: “If an outbreak of protests enhances the case for a planning injunction, this risks an impetus for further protests some of which may be disorderly surrounding asylum accommodation.
“At its worst, if even unlawful protests are to be treated, there is a risk of further lawlessness.”
Epping Forest District Council had asked for the injunction after the Bell Hotel became the focal point of several protests and counter-protests. It claimed its owner, Somani Hotels, had breached planning rules.
Mr Justice Eyre had said that while the council had not “definitively established” that the company had breached planning rules, “the strength of the claimant’s case is such that it weighs in favour” of granting the injunction.
Regular protests have been held outside the Bell Hotel since an asylum seeker housed there was accused of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl in July.
Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denies two counts of sexual assault, one count of attempted sexual assault, one count of inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity, and one count of harassment without violence.
His trial has been taking place this week and verdicts are expected at Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court on 4 September.
Be the first to get Breaking News
Install the Sky News app for free
Barristers for Epping Forest District Council told the High Court earlier this month that the temporary injunction should be granted as the housing of asylum seekers at the site was causing a “very serious problem” which “could not be much worse”.
Somani Hotels opposed the bid, with its lawyers stating that the “draconian” move would cause asylum seekers “hardship” and that “political views” were not grounds for an injunction to be made.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.
